Q Module 7Case Study Assignment Case Study Analysis In this assignment, you have one case to analyze. Please answer the questions that follow the case. There are several key things to keep in mind: The title of the assignment does not necessarily capture an accurate diagnosis of the situation or cluster of symptoms. These are incomplete situations and you may decide to reference a different disorder in the DSM-5 than the one in the title or mentioned in the situation. This is to reflect the reality of the presentation of disorders in a real clinical setting. Most clients and patients enter a clinical setting with a general idea or label/name for what they are experiencing. It may be clinically relevant or may be clinically incorrect. With clinical information being almost immediately accessible due to the Internet and other forms of education (e.g., social media), much of a clinical interview requires corrective teaching or curious investigation about what the words being used actually represent and symbolize in behavioral presentation and sensation. This may be confusing or feel clear cut, depending on the situation and your own learning. The assignment is not to diagnose but to identify symptoms and behaviors that may lead to a diagnosis. Diagnosis is beyond your current level of learning and beyond your ethical capacity as a student without a license and without operating under someone with a license. Instead, we will be identifying behaviors or possible symptoms, not disorders, in these activities. Case for Analysis Evil Eye Questions to Answer: • What are your initial thoughts and what are follow up questions that you would ask to clarify the diagnostic picture? • What are ethical considerations that are relevant to the case and might impact the situation identified? • What are the observable markers, as defined by the DSM-5, that are found in the presented information? Answer each question as completely as possible. Your submission should conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Include at least 2 scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references. Rubric Module 3-8 Case Study Module 3-8 Case Study Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples 5 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 3 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples don't meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 2 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style 5 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 4 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 3 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 2 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style 5 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error. 4 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors. 3 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors. 2 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors. 5 pts Total Points: 45 PreviousNext